In a trial setting, what term is used to define a witness called in for further testimony later?

Prepare for the AAERT Certified Electronic Transcriber (CET) Exam. Engage with interactive quizzes and detailed explanations for confidence in the electronic transcription field. Start your journey towards certification success!

The term that defines a witness called in for further testimony later in a trial setting is referred to as rebuttal. This occurs when one party presents additional evidence or testimony to counter or disprove the evidence presented by the opposing side. Rebuttal allows for the introduction of new testimony that addresses points made during the initial testimony, helping to strengthen the party's case.

In contrast, cross-examination is the process where a witness is questioned by the opposing side, typically following the direct examination. An affidavit is a written statement confirmed under oath, often used as evidence in legal proceedings but not necessarily involving witness testimony in court. A subpoena is a legal document that orders an individual to appear in court or produce evidence, but it does not specifically refer to the testimony of a witness being called back later. Thus, rebuttal is the most accurate term to describe the situation of having a witness provide further testimony.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy