In which scenario would contempt of court likely occur?

Contempt of court is a legal finding that occurs when someone disobeys or shows disrespect for a court's authority, which is typically linked to noncompliance with court orders. In the scenario described, failing to comply with a court order directly demonstrates a disregard for the court's directives, which can lead to punitive measures to uphold the court's authority. This includes actions like ignoring a subpoena, violating a restraining order, or not following through with specific instructions given by a judge.

While disputing witness testimony or presenting hearsay evidence may be contentious in a courtroom, they do not inherently involve disrespect or disregard for the court's authority. Disputing testimony is a typical part of legal proceedings that is resolved through the appropriate legal processes and does not violate the court’s orders directly. Similarly, hearsay evidence can be objected to within the courtroom framework but doesn't punish or disrespect court authority. Requesting a change of venue pertains to the procedural aspects of a case and, unless improperly handled, does not reflect contempt either.

Thus, failing to comply with a court order is the clearest and most direct path to a contempt finding, as it fundamentally undermines the court's ability to enforce its rulings.