In which scenario would you include “jury present” after the call to order?

Including “jury present” after the call to order is appropriate when the jury is physically present in the courtroom. This notation serves to officially acknowledge their presence at the beginning of a legal proceeding, indicating that the trial is ready to commence. It sets the stage for all participants in the case, including attorneys and judges, to conduct proceedings in front of the jury, who are central to the trial process.

This practice underscores the importance of the jury in deliberations and ensures that the record reflects the moment when they are formally acknowledged. It captures a critical aspect of courtroom protocol, establishing that the trial is in session with the jury ready to participate in hearings, evidence presentation, or testimonies.

In other scenarios, such as when the jury is taking a break or when starting a new case, the presence of the jury is not relevant to the call to order. Additionally, noting the seating of all participants does not require a formal acknowledgment of the jury’s presence, as the court proceedings revolve around their involvement during active sessions. Thus, recognizing when the jury is physically in the courtroom is vital for the integrity and formal record of courtroom proceedings.