What action might follow the discovery of new evidence that contradicts prior statements?

The action that follows the discovery of new evidence that contradicts prior statements is the need for a recantation of the previous statement. This is because when new evidence emerges that challenges the credibility or correctness of what was previously stated, it can lead to a reassessment of that testimony. A recantation involves formally withdrawing or renouncing the earlier statement, acknowledging that it may no longer be accurate due to the newly discovered evidence.

This process is essential in legal contexts, as it ensures that the record is updated and reflects the most current and truthful information, which can significantly affect the outcome of a case. Addressing previous statements in light of new evidence is a critical part of the justice system’s pursuit of truth and fairness.