What differentiates a challenge for cause from a peremptory challenge?

A challenge for cause requires a rational reason or justification for excluding a potential juror from a jury panel. This typically involves demonstrating that the juror has a specific bias, preconception, or relationship that would prevent them from being impartial in the case at hand. This challenges the fitness of a juror based on legitimate concerns about their ability to serve fairly.

On the other hand, a peremptory challenge does not require any specific reasoning; the party can dismiss a juror for any reason, as long as it is not based on discriminatory factors. This mechanism provides more flexibility to attorneys in jury selection.

Understanding this distinction is crucial in the context of jury selection processes, as it underscores the difference in the rationale behind each type of challenge and the implications for ensuring a fair trial.