What does it mean to "recuse" a judge?

To "recuse" a judge refers to the act of disqualifying that judge from hearing a particular case. This typically occurs when there is a potential conflict of interest, bias, or a situation that might prevent the judge from being impartial. Recusal helps maintain the fairness and integrity of the judicial process by ensuring that all parties receive an unbiased evaluation of their case.

In practice, a judge may voluntarily recuse themselves or may be required to do so by law or a motion filed by one of the parties involved in the case. This step is essential in upholding the standards of justice and preventing any appearance of impropriety in the legal proceedings. The focus on impartiality is crucial for maintaining public trust in the judicial system.

The other options refer to different legal processes or actions but do not align with the specific concept of recusal. Appointing a new judge pertains to a separate action that could occur after a recusal, while delaying a trial concerns scheduling and logistical issues, not the judge's qualifications or impartiality. Accepting a plea deal is a procedural term related to criminal law and negotiations between the prosecution and defense that is entirely separate from the judge's role in a trial.