What heading should be used if voir dire is conducted without the jury present?

Prepare for the AAERT Certified Electronic Transcriber (CET) Exam. Engage with interactive quizzes and detailed explanations for confidence in the electronic transcription field. Start your journey towards certification success!

The appropriate heading to use when voir dire is conducted without the jury present is the "Name." This heading serves as a clear identifier for the proceedings and maintains consistency throughout the transcript. In legal transcription, it is essential to document the names of the individuals involved, including the judge, attorneys, and witnesses, as they contribute to the context and understanding of the proceedings.

Using the "Name" heading allows transcribers to record who is speaking and when. This is particularly important in voir dire, where attorneys may ask potential jurors questions, and it's essential to clarify who is being addressed or who is addressing the court. By employing this heading, clarity and accuracy in the transcription are upheld, ensuring that the record accurately reflects the conversation that takes place during this stage of the trial.

The other choices, such as "Duty of Jury," "Defendant," and "Witness List," do not specifically serve the purpose of indicating who is involved in the voir dire process without the jury present. Instead, they pertain to different aspects of court procedures or documentation that do not directly address the context in which the questions are being asked and answered during voir dire.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy