When marking an exhibit for the index page, what condition must be met?

The correct choice pertains to the requirement that an exhibit must have been marked during testimony in order to be included on the index page. This condition is essential because it ensures that the exhibit has been formally acknowledged and referenced as part of the record during the proceedings. By being marked during testimony, it confirms that the exhibit is relevant to the matter at hand and has been introduced into the proceedings in compliance with legal protocols.

This practice serves multiple purposes, including maintaining the integrity of the record and providing clarity on what evidence was presented and discussed in the context of the case. It also aids in referencing the exhibit for further review, whether by the court or by parties involved in the proceedings.

Other options, while they might seem relevant to the process of handling exhibits, do not fulfill the specific requirement indicated in the question. For instance, having a signature from an attorney, submitting the exhibit at the end of the hearing, or needing a review by the judge, while important in other contexts, do not directly address the condition necessary for the exhibit’s placement on the index page.