Which action is a proper legal procedure described in the context of courtroom activities?

Playing an audio recording as evidence is a recognized procedure in legal contexts, particularly during courtroom activities. This method allows the court to hear the recorded material directly, providing vital information relevant to the case at hand. Audio evidence can support or contradict the testimonies given by witnesses, adding an essential layer to the overall case presentation.

When introducing audio recordings, specific protocols must be followed to ensure that the evidence is admissible and properly authenticated. This includes verifying that the recording is complete, unaltered, and relevant to the issues being examined. By utilizing audio recordings, the legal process aims to provide clearer insights and uphold the integrity of the information presented during the trial.

In contrast, dismissing a witness with prejudice pertains to legal terminologies surrounding the treatment of testimonies and can raise complex procedural issues. Mutual agreements on legal fees do not directly relate to the courtroom proceedings themselves but are part of pretrial negotiations. Questioning a juror individually is a part of jury selection or voir dire, but it does not represent a broad legal procedure in courtroom activities as effectively as the introduction of audio evidence.