Which of the following actions might require the reporter to read back previous statements?

The action that typically requires the reporter to read back previous statements is when clarifications are needed. This is essential because reviewing prior statements allows all parties involved, including the judge, attorneys, and witnesses, to ensure clarity and accuracy in the record. Reading back previous statements helps to resolve any misunderstandings or ambiguity in the testimony, allowing for effective communication and a clear understanding of what was previously stated.

Clarifications are crucial in legal proceedings to maintain a precise and transparent record. If a witness's statement is unclear, or if there are discrepancies that need to be addressed, referring back to what was already said can enhance the accuracy of the ongoing proceedings. This action contributes to the integrity of the transcript and ensures that all legal standards are upheld during the court process.